Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
TEM | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Key Points
●
●
●
●
Recent drilling shows presence of critical minerals including Nickel and Rare Earths
Results include:
● 5m @ 0.11% Nickel + 0.09% Chromium from 101m
● 3m @ 0.54% Tungsten (WO3) and 0.07% Cobalt from 21m
● 6m @ 0.13% REO (Rare Earth Element Oxide) - 686ppm Cerium + 348 Lanthanum + 86pm Yttrium
from 51m
○ Including: 3m @ 0.2% REO - 1,085ppm Ce + 348ppm La + 135ppm Y from 48m
Results highlight prospectivity of the Yalgoo Region for multiple commodities
TEM currently reviewing detailed results with a view for further drilling in 2023
Summary
Tempest Minerals Ltd (TEM) is pleased to update the market regarding assay results received from drilling
completed in late 2022 at the Company’s 100% Meleya Project. TEM completed 91 holes for 7,410 metres of
drilling. Assays from 6,346 metres of aircore and reverse circulation drilling have returned with the remaining
diamond drill program results expected during Q1 2023. The initial review of results shows highly anomalous
results for a number of critical metals including Nickel, Tungsten, Cobalt and Rare Earths Elements (REE).
Meleya Project
Background
The Meleya Project is part of Tempest Minerals’ flagship
Yalgoo Portfolio that extends over a footprint of more
than 1,000km2. The interpreted Yalgoo Greenstone
Supracrustal unit encompasses a rough area of
4,000km² indicating that Tempest holds approximately
25% of the active exploration leases regionally.
Tempest has for some time considered the target zones
at Meleya to represent one of the most exciting
greenfields base and precious metal upside exploration
opportunities in the industry today.
After noting a discordant regional geophysical signature
1
in 2019 , TEM identified 50 km (strike length) of a
previously unrecognised and unexplored segment of the
Yalgoo Greenstone Belt - the Meleya Project - and has
been actively exploring it since, including extensive
fieldwork and geochemical sampling.
2
In early 2022 , TEM drilled the first 2 holes into the new
province at the Orion Target. This drilling and follow-up
work indicated the presence of significant mineralisation
and highlighted the increased regional potential.
3
In September 2022 , TEM commenced a second larger
drilling campaign aimed at testing two coincident
anomalous geochemical and geophysical (magnetic)
Tempest Minerals Ltd │ ACN 612 008 358
Phone: +61 8 9200 0435
Address: Level 2, Suite 9, 389 Oxford Street, Mt Hawthorn, WA 6016
Page 1 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
targets and additionally a wide-spaced shallow regional percussion drilling program. The completion of this
4
drilling was announced in December 2022 .
2022 Drilling Overview
Following on from the mineralisation discovery made at the Orion target in March 2022, TEM commenced a
larger scale regional drilling program
5
with the aim to collect geochemical data to augment the existing soil
sampling or test areas where surface sampling is more challenging or inappropriate. The regional program
also provides the opportunity to correlate geology from surface mapping and deep diamond holes across
large distances and provide targets for follow-up drilling.
This shallow drilling was conducted on nominal 500m x 500m spacing and the campaign in Q4 2022 with an
area of some 4km x 4km of the central Meleya Belt tested. The program - phase 1 of a number of possible
campaigns - consisted of 6,346 metres of aircore and reverse circulation drilling, though this represents a
small fraction of the total Meleya Project.
Figure 02: Meleya Project Project Overview
Geology
The geology of the Meleya Project was previously interpreted from geophysics and several large-scale
6
mapping and surface geochemistry campaigns . Current drilling has further confirmed previous geological
interpretations of the region and provided multiple new insights. E.g. The Clover target RC transect provides
2.5km of lateral lithological definition down to 200m of depth into fresh rock. The primary lithology is mafic
and felsic ‘greenstones’ wrapped around a shallow intermediate intrusion known as the Walganna Suite, and
is flanked on the eastern side by felsic volcanics interpreted as a continuation of the Big Bell Suite.
Structures - both stratiform and crosscutting ‘feeder’ zones - are considered the source of the multiple
mineralisation styles (Skarn, Volcanogenic Massive Sulphides (VMS), Intrusion Related Gold (IRG) deposits
and Orogenic vein style gold) present in the district.
Page 2 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
A number of these structures were intersected by the most recent grid drilling and appear to host a number of
critical minerals previously not observed at Meleya including Rare Earths, Nickel and Tungsten.
Figure 03: Meleya Project Drilling Program Overview
Critical Metals
Tungsten:
Highly anomalous Tungsten is present in numerous holes and appears related to a Skarn type mineralised
system.
WARDH83 was drilled through regolith to a depth of 40m and intercepted a potentially weathered skarn zone
peripheral to an interpreted mafic sill with significant visible extent in aeromagnetic surveys. This zone was
likely reactive to fluid migrating from an intruding dolerite sill interacting with the fertile greenstones in this
portion of the belt. WARDH83 hosted the best intercept 3m @ 0.54% Tungsten TriOxide (WO3) and 0.07%
Cobalt from 21m. This is ~600m downtrend of the skarn alteration in WARDH75 on the Clover drill line.
Although assays remain outstanding for the diamond hole in this area, visibly skarn-altered zones in
WARDH75 highlight consistent enrichment in tungsten within the horizon. This alteration was traced along
the sill contact to hole WARDH139 and spans an approximate contact length of 450m.
WARDH139 sampling uncovered Tungsten grades of 0.09% WO3 (710ppm W) from 166m followed by 0.11%
WO3 (930ppm W) within a a total intercept of 4m @ 0.05% WO3 (428ppm W from 163m). Another zone due
east in hole WARDH135 contained intercepts of 1m @ 0.15% WO3 (1,220ppm W) from 159m. As this hole
Page 3 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
was abandoned at 167m due to excess downhole water, further drilling may be required to ascertain the full
extent of this mineralisation.
An additional anomalous tungsten zone was located in WARDH122 with 1m @ 0.26% WO3 (2,050ppm) from
45m. This was hosted at the base of the regolith within the Big Bell granite suite.
Mineralogical and hyperspectral work is underway to determine and understand the anomalies and how to
best target these horizons. In particular, the extent of the mineralisation which was encountered at the end of
hole WARDH139 which ended on 0.11% WO3.
Key Intercepts:
Zone 1
●
3m @ 0.54% WO3 (4,270ppm W ) and 0.07% Co (699ppm) from 21m (WARDH83)
●
1m @ 0.26% WO3 (2,050ppm W) from 45m (WARDH122)
●
1m @ 0.15% WO3 (1,220ppm W ) from 159m (WARDH135)
●
4m @ 0.05% WO3 (428ppm W ) from 163m (WARDH139)
Including 1m @ 0.11% WO3 (930 ppm W) from 166m (EOH sample)
●
●
1m @ 0.09% WO3 (710ppm W ) from 145m (WARDH139)
●
1m @ 0.06% WO3 (520ppm W ) from 150m (WARDH142)
Nickel:
The most prominent Nickel enriched zone 5m @ 0.11% Nickel and 0.09% Chromium appears in WARDH156
hosted in an altered mafic to ultramafic volcanic . Hole WARDH156 additionally contains enrichment in
Tungsten at 128.5ppm and Lithium at 193ppm. Assays indicate an ultramafic source with MgO (Magnesium
Oxide) averaging at 19.8% and FeO (Iron Oxide) averaging at 11.6%. This is an exciting development for the
Meleya Project, as Nickel bearing mafic to ultramafic geology has previously not been documented but
7
geology of this type can be the ideal host for significant Nickel deposits .
An additional zone with a similar metal content was seen in hole WARDH150 with 9m @ 0.05% Nickel + 0.06%
Chromium from 36m. This represents a separate crustal setting just over 3km to the east of DH156 and is
hosted within a demagnetised altered intrusive. Modelling is being carried out to better understand the nature
of these high priority mineralisations.
Key Intercepts:
Zone 1
●
5m @ 0.11% Ni + 0.09% Cr from 101m (WARDH156)
And Zone 2
●
9m @ 0.05% Ni + 0.06% Cr from 36m (WARDH150)
Copper-Zinc:
The distribution of anomalous Copper-Zinc mineralisation throughout the drill program is primarily
concentrated in structures propagating from the Clover line (see figure 3). Some anomalies appear to be
stratiform or stratigraphically hosted and elevated values correlate between drill lines along strike of the
interpreted boundaries of the main greenstone package first delineated by the initial Orion Diamond Holes
WARDH072
8
9
and WARDH73 .
Page 4 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Initial work indicates these anomalies have a VMS (volcanogenic massive sulphide) or similar geochemical
fingerprint
10
to a mineral assemblage, in particular that of the Gossan Hill Deposit at Golden Grove. This
mode of mineralisation is one of the primary exploration targets of this drilling campaign and the anomalous
Cu-Zn in this form is particularly strong along the Clover drill line at the convergence of several regional scale
fault and shear zones and later stage regional dolerite dykes.
Multiple holes located in the ‘Clover Target’ drill section encountered broad zones of highly anomalous base
metals on the western and eastern margins including:
As seen in figure 4 these grades are significantly elevated - up to 4 times the normal regional geological
background values - and combined with the intense alteration suggest a wider mineralising system at play
such as VMS or skarn. This is in line with the geological theory underpinning the Meleya Belt and as originally
hypothesised during the Orion Diamond program in early 2022 and is encouraging for further exploration.
Figure 04: ‘Clover Target’ Drill section with Copper/Zinc enrichment
Key Intercepts:
●
●
●
●
●
●
163m @ 149ppm Cu + 101ppm Zn + 126ppm Ni + 309ppm Cr (WARDH79)
71m @ 186ppm Cu, 152ppm Zn, 106ppm Ni and 333ppm Cr (WARDH146)
4m @ 353ppm Cu + 425 ppm Zn + 149ppm Ni (WARDH145)
1m @ 617ppm Cu + 93ppm Zn + 126ppm Ni (WARDH 110)
118m @ 138ppm Cu, 120ppm Zn (WARDH138)
○ Including 1m @ 750ppm Cu + 97ppm Zn + 138ppm Ni (WARDH138)
88m @ 132ppm Cu, 99ppm Zn, 134ppm Ni and 281ppm Cr (WARDH139)
Page 5 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Rare Earth Elements and Scandium:
Concentrations of rare earth elements in particular Cerium, Lanthanum and Yttrium have been discovered in
significant proportion at the base of regolith across several key structural contacts on the north-eastern and
south eastern corners of the drill program. Hyperspectral logging is being undertaken to understand the
nature of their mineralisation, a strategy will be designed to follow up and determine controls to target.
Key Intercepts*:
● 6m @ 0.13% REO (Rare Earth Element Oxide) - 686ppm Ce + 348 La + 86pm Y from 51m
○ Including: 3m @ 0.2% REO - 1085ppm Ce + 348ppm La + 135ppm Y from 48m
And
●
●
●
●
4m @ 0.09% REO from 23m in WARDH150m (552ppm Ce + 238ppm La + 50ppm Y)
4m @ 0.05% REO from 32m in WARDH79 (244ppm Ce + 144ppm La + 194ppm Y)
6m @ 0.03% REO from 9m in WARDH121 (237ppm Ce + 69ppm La + 4ppm Y)
1m @ 0.05% REO from 22m in WARDH138 (18ppm Ce + 375ppm La + 331ppm Y)
(WARDH145)
● 7m @ 0.011% Sc2O3 (91ppm Sc) from 51m
○ Including 3m @ 0.013% Sc2O3 (104ppm Sc) from 52m
● 4m @ 111ppm Sc2O3 from 44m
(WARDH146)
* Note the method for assay 4 acid digest is not the preferred method for dissolving and assaying rare earth element mineralogy and is just an
estimate showing only 4 of total 15 rare earth elements.
Conclusions
Visibly altered domains correlate well with anomalous metal endowment. Unexpected high levels of nickel,
tungsten and rare earth elements in particular may relate to zones of potential VMS style mineralisation
hosted within the interpreted greenstone belt or potential Skarn style mineralisation.
The drill program has highlighted critical mineral mineralisation is concentrated along many major lithological
and structural contacts. In particular some of the highest grades of Copper, Zinc, Tungsten, Cobalt and REE
are positioned around the Clover target in the southern portion of the drill program. Furthermore, the northern
lines also showed notable grades of Nickel and REO (Rare Earth Element Oxide).
This program has vectored in on the prospectivity of the “Anaesthesia” target (Figure 3), coincidently this
target falls on a large bullseye aeromagnetic target. Initial data indicates that there is a relationship between
anomalous geochemical anomalies present around the Clover target increase proportionally to the density of
structures.
The Anaesthesia target is a point within the interpreted greenstone belt that has bifurcated, likely from intense
faulting and may provide an ideal host environment for major deposits. This same fault is aligned with some
of the broadest zones of copper and zinc on the eastern end of the Clover line while also appearing along
strike of the same interpreted stratigraphic horizon as the Orion and Clover Cu-Zn enhanced greenstones. The
zone also has been interjected by two east-west striking dykes and the large belt concordant mafic intrusion
interpreted to have influenced the intense alteration responsible for the highest tungsten grades.
This program has tested laterally and to base of regolith along high priority surface features (including Orion
and Clover). Results have indicated that the subsurface is similarly elevated and that further science and
technology is required to narrow down and further enhance prospective targets. To date all Meleya diamond
holes have been scanned using a Geotek Boxscan which “delivers consistent, non-subjective, automated
depth registered imagery, geochemistry, mineralogy, and structural parameters from one mobile core
scanning system”
12
. Moreover, priority reverse circulation and aircore hole box scanning will be fast tracked
to better understand the complex mineralised alteration encountered across the recent program, applying this
data to the wider area will ensure targets are ranked to their utmost potential.
Page 6 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Next Steps
- Modelling of all drilling results and multisensor hyperspectral data underway
- Review of drilling data with view for further potential drilling
- Assay results for diamond drilling due in late Q1
- Assay results for Meleya east (Ktulu) surface sampling program due in February
The Board of the Company has authorised the release of this announcement to the market.
About TEM
Tempest Minerals Ltd is an Australian based mineral exploration company with a diversified portfolio of
projects in Western Australia considered highly prospective for precious, base and energy metals. The
Company has an experienced board and management team with a history of exploration, opLinkedInerational
and corporate success.
Tempest leverages the team’s energy, technical and commercial acumen to execute the Company’s mission to maximise shareholder value through focussed, data-driven, risk-weighted exploration and development of
our assets.
Investor Information
investorhub.tempestminerals.com
TEM welcomes direct engagement and encourages shareholders and interested parties to visit the TEM
Investor hub which provides additional background information, videos and a forum for stakeholders to
communicate with each other and with the company.
Contact
For more information, please contact:
Don Smith
Managing Director
Level 2, Suite 9
389 Oxford Street
Mt Hawthorn,
Western Australia
6016
Website
Instagram
LinkedIn
Twitter
Youtube
Facebook
+61 892000435
Page 7 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Forward-looking statements
This document may contain certain forward-looking statements. Such statements are only predictions, based on certain
assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the company’s
control. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results expected or implied in any forward-looking
statement. The inclusion of such statements should not be regarded as a representation, warranty or prediction with respect to
the accuracy of the underlying assumptions or that any forward-looking statements will be or are likely to be fulfilled. Tempest
undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this
document (subject to securities exchange disclosure requirements). The information in this document does not take into
account the objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person or organisation. Nothing contained in this document
constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice.
Competent Person Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and general project comments is based on information
compiled by Don Smith who is the Managing Director to Tempest Minerals Ltd. Don is a Member of AusIMM, AIG and GSA and
has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as
a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves’. Don consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form
and context in which it appears.
Page 8 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program
Appendix A: References
1. LI3 ASX Announcement dated 20 March 2020 “Exploration Update”
2. TEM ASX Announcement dated 28 March 2022 “Meleya Update - Significant Discovery At Orion Target”
TEM ASX Announcement dated 02 April 2022 “Meleya Update - Further mineralisation drilled at the Orion
discovery”
3. TEM ASX Announcement dated 05 September 2022 “Meleya Update - Drilling Commences At Master”
4. TEM ASX Announcement dated 14 December 2022 “Meleya Update - Completion of drilling 2022”
5. TEM ASX Announcement dated 20 October 2022 “Meleya Update - Drilling In Progress At Clover Target”
6. LI3 ASX Announcement dated 18 August 2020 “Meleya Zone Targets Identified From New Geophysical
Data”
7. Hoatson D., Jaques L., Jaireth S., Towner R. & Huleatt M. (2004) “Nickel Sulphide Deposits in Australia:
Resources and Potential”
8. TEM ASX Announcement dated 08 July 2022 “Meleya Update - DHEM Survey Compliments Initial Assays At
Orion”
9. TEM ASX Announcement dated 08 September 2022 “Meleya Update - Orion DHEM Survey And Assays
Confirm Project Potential”
10. Smith R.E., Perdrix J.L (1982) “Pisolitic Laterite Geochemistry In The Golden Grove Massive Sulphide
District, Western Australia”
11. Williams-Jones A.E., Vasyukova O.V. (2018) The Economic Geology Of Scandium, The Runt Of The Rare
Earth Element Litter
12. https://www.geotek.co.uk/products/boxscan/ (Accessed 13 February 2023)
Page 9 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program | JORC TABLE 1
Appendix B: JORC Table 1
RC and Aircore Drilling
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
Sampling techniques
JORC Code explanation
●
●
●
●
Commentary
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which
3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more
explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
●
●
●
●
Reverse circulation and Aircore drilling was used to obtain samples for geological
logging and assaying.
The Drillhole was undertaken to test geochemical and geophysical anomalies as
well as understanding the stratigraphy to enable further target testing.
Sample was collected via the cyclone splitter, across the regolith 3 metre
composites were taken from the UV bag and in fresh rock 1 metre samples were
collected from the split..
All samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories in Perth and were multielement
(48 elements) tested via 4 acid digestion (ME-MS61) and a 30g fire assay
(AU-ICP21).
Drilling techniques
●
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so,
by what method, etc).
●
A T450 dual purpose truck mounted drill rig was used to drill reverse circulation
and aircore holes.
Drill sample recovery
●
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of
the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
●
Drilling was undertaken using a ‘best practice’ approach to achieve maximum
sample recovery and quality through the mineralised zones.
Best practice sampling procedure included:
○
Dust suppression,
○
levelled cyclone
○
cleaning of sampling equipment
○
ensuring a dry sample
○
supervision by competent field staff (Geologist and field technician).
No relationship between sample recovery and grade is known at this stage: more
drilling is required to establish if there is any sample bias.
Samples were dry and recoveries were excellent and usually >95%. Rare sample
loss occurred around geological structure.
●
●
●
●
●
Page 10 | 31
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program | JORC TABLE 1
Logging
●
●
●
Sub-sampling techniques and
sample preparation
●
●
●
●
●
●
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
●
●
●
Verification of sampling and
assaying
●
●
●
●
Location of data points
●
●
●
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged
to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel,
etc) photography.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.
●
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled
wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
●
●
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of
bias) and precision have been established.
●
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
●
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
●
Page 11 | 31
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
RC and AC chips were logged by competent geologists with sufficient experience
in this geological terrane and relevant styles of mineralisation using an industry
standard logging Lithology, mineralisation, alteration and veining systems to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies
and metallurgical studies.
Geological logging is both qualitative and quantitative.
The total length was verified between the sample bags and the drill rods down
hole. Significant changes in sample bag volumes were noted down.
A 2-3kg sample (split) was split via the cyclone.
QAQC entailed a revolving Blank/Standard/Duplicate at every 20th sample
downhole. The duplicate was split by the driller using the cyclone.
The cyclone was cleaned between each run to ensure sample quality.
Field and laboratory duplicates, certified reference sampling and blank standards
will be used regularly throughout the sampling process to ensure quality and
appropriateness of the assay technique(s).
Tempests database is hosted in a cloud database system
All QAQC data was reviewed in Shewhart plots with all at acceptable ranges
As the assays are from an initial drilling campaign, independent referee laboratory
analyses or twinned holes are not yet applicable.
Geological logging was completed using in-house logging data systems. All data
entry is carried out by qualified personnel. Standard data entry is used on site, and
is backed up directly to a cloud-based database.
Drill hole locations collected by handheld GPS (±3m horizontal, up to 12m vertical
error - however error was consistently below 4m.
Grid: Datum WGS84 UTM Zone 50S
Down hole surveys have been carried out by Strike Drilling using a Reflex Multi
Shot Survey Camera, and core orientation using Reflex ACT III Orientation Tool.
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program | JORC TABLE 1
Data spacing and distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore
Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
●
●
●
●
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample security
●
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
●
Sample bags were collected onsite and moved on scheduled weekly or fortnightly
collections directly to the laboratory in Perth by Tempest or contract personnel.
Audits or reviews
●
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
●
No audits have been completed at this time
●
●
●
Orientation of data in relation to
geological structure
●
●
●
●
●
Not relevant to the current drilling.
Drill holes were placed based on geological targeting and were spaced according
to geology and historical gold intersects of each target.
Sampling will be undertaken through all potential mineralisation zones
Sampling at 1m, 2m or 3m composited intervals.
No compositing applied
The understanding of the structure and geology intersected in drilling is in
progress and accurate true widths cannot be assumed at this time.
At present it is not believed that the drilling orientation has introduced any
sampling bias.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
Mineral tenement and land
tenure status
JORC Code explanation
●
●
Exploration done by other parties
●
Commentary
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements
or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
●
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
●
Page 12 | 31
●
●
●
All drillhole information quoted is from E5902375. This lease is owned 100% by Warrigal
Mining Pty Ltd which is a subsidiary of Tempest Minerals Ltd.
No overriding interests are present to the Company’s knowledge.
Tempest acknowledges the traditional owners of the land.
The project is on managed land and has been approved by DBCA and DMIRS under
Program of works
N/A
ASX : TEM
2023-02-14 | Meleya Update - Critical Metals In Regional Drilling Program | JORC TABLE 1
Ge
Share your feedback
Discover